FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Where Do Experts & Public Agree on Democracy Under Trump?

American Politics subfield banner

This study examines perceptions of U.S. democracy's importance and performance during the first year-and-a-half of Donald Trump's presidency using original survey data from political experts and the public.

🔍 Data & Methods

Drawing upon a theory regarding democratic constraints, this research surveys expert opinions alongside public views on specific dimensions of democratic erosion.

💡 Key Findings

While significant disagreement exists between experts and supporters/traditional opponents over what constitutes democratic erosion, both groups largely agree that checks and balances have eroded during the Trump presidency. However, polarization intensifies these divisions.

💭 Why It Matters:

The findings offer a nuanced perspective on how American democracy is perceived as evolving under contemporary leadership—revealing areas where broad agreement on democratic principles persists even amidst intense political disagreement.

Article card for article: Searching for Bright Lines in the Trump Presidency
Searching for Bright Lines in the Trump Presidency was authored by John Carey, Gretchen Helmke, Brendan Nyhan, Mitchell Sanders and Susan Stokes. It was published by Cambridge in POP in 2019.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Cambridge University Press
Perspectives on Politics