FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
Insights from the Field

Does Racist Elite Speech Embolden Prejudiced Citizens? A New Look at Trump's Impact


racial prejudice
elite communication
emboldening effect
Trump campaign
American Politics
BJPS
1 Stata files
2 text files
1 datasets
Dataverse
The Trump Effect: An Experimental Investigation of the Emboldening Effect of Racially Inflammatory Elite Communication was authored by Benjamin Newman, Jennifer L. Merolla, Sono Shah, Danielle Casarez Lemi, Loren Collingwood and S. Karthick Ramakrishnan. It was published by Cambridge in BJPS in 2021.

In a politically charged environment, racial inflammatory remarks by elites may have unexpected consequences. This article examines how the 2016 Trump campaign's use of explicit racial language influenced prejudiced citizens in the United States.

Research Context:

The study explores elite communication during American elections and its effect on citizens with deeply ingrained racial biases despite widespread equality norms.

Experimental Design & Findings:

Through a survey experiment embedded within an online panel, this research uncovers:

  • Without explicit support from elites, prejudiced individuals tend to limit their racist expressions.
  • Explicitly inflammatory speech by elites can significantly embolden these citizens.
  • The effect is amplified when other political elites tacitly condone such language.

The findings suggest that even subtle elite signals about racial issues may play a powerful role in shaping public discourse and behavior.

data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
Podcast host Ryan