FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Does Racist Elite Speech Embolden Prejudiced Citizens? A New Look at Trump's Impact

American Politics subfield banner

In a politically charged environment, racial inflammatory remarks by elites may have unexpected consequences. This article examines how the 2016 Trump campaign's use of explicit racial language influenced prejudiced citizens in the United States.

Research Context:

The study explores elite communication during American elections and its effect on citizens with deeply ingrained racial biases despite widespread equality norms.

Experimental Design & Findings:

Through a survey experiment embedded within an online panel, this research uncovers:

  • Without explicit support from elites, prejudiced individuals tend to limit their racist expressions.
  • Explicitly inflammatory speech by elites can significantly embolden these citizens.
  • The effect is amplified when other political elites tacitly condone such language.

The findings suggest that even subtle elite signals about racial issues may play a powerful role in shaping public discourse and behavior.

Article card for article: The Trump Effect: An Experimental Investigation of the Emboldening Effect of Racially Inflammatory Elite Communication
The Trump Effect: An Experimental Investigation of the Emboldening Effect of Racially Inflammatory Elite Communication was authored by Benjamin Newman, Jennifer L. Merolla, Sono Shah, Danielle Casarez Lemi, Loren Collingwood and S. Karthick Ramakrishnan. It was published by Cambridge in BJPS in 2021.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Cambridge University Press
British Journal of Political Science