This paper examines how foreign aid is strategically allocated following natural disasters.

Strategic Calculus Shifted by Natural Disasters

The authors argue that natural disasters serve as exogenous shocks altering the strategic calculus of donor countries. These events create opportunities for donors to exert influence on specific states through targeted humanitarian and civil society assistance, while maintaining their development aid relationships with traditional allies.

Key Findings

* Donor generosity following natural disasters is not purely altruistic but reflects underlying geopolitical calculations.

* Humanitarian and civil society aid are strategically allocated tools for influencing opponents.

* Development aid to allies remains unaffected by disaster events.

Methodological Contribution

The study introduces a novel measure of strategic interest, capturing indirect ties and multi-dimensional state interactions beyond traditional proxies. This allows for more nuanced analysis than previous research.

The findings suggest that natural disasters primarily serve as tools for maintaining geopolitical relationships rather than indicators of purely humanitarian generosity.