FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
Hawkish Partisans: Why Democracy May Fuel Nationalist Conflicts in Asia
Insights from the Field
democratic parties
autocratic parties
nationalism-conflict
democracy-asylum
Asian Politics
BJPS
12 R files
4 Stata files
2 other files
4 datasets
1 text files
Dataverse
Hawkish Partisans: How Political Parties Shape Nationalist Conflicts in China and Japan was authored by Daniel Mattingly, Trevor Incerti, Frances Rosenbluth, Seiki Takana and Jiahua Yue. It was published by Cambridge in BJPS in 2021.

Political parties shape nationalism differently across democracies and autocracies.

Democratic Japan: Party supporters actively demand hawkish foreign policy if they are nationalist. Leaders face pressure to appease these voters during protests.

Autocratic China: Elite insiders within the ruling party show less responsiveness to nationalist displays, potentially dampening conflict-prone behavior.

The Contrast: This suggests democratic institutions might unintentionally encourage nationalism-driven international tensions through supporter accountability mechanisms.

Methodology:* Comparative analysis of protest dynamics in both countries;

Key Finding:* Japanese leaders are more likely punished for moderate nationalist posturing;

Implication:* Democracy's accountability systems may sometimes exacerbate rather than mitigate nationalistic conflicts.

data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
British Journal of Political Science
Podcast host Ryan