FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
Criminal Records and College Admissions: A Surprising Double Standard?
Insights from the Field
criminal records
field experiments
college admissions
racial bias
Public Administration
BJPS
10 R files
7 datasets
1 text files
Dataverse
Locked Out of College: When Admissions Bureaucrats Do and Do Not Discriminate was authored by Jacob R. Brown and Hanno Hilbig. It was published by Cambridge in BJPS in 2022.

Individuals with criminal records face reduced engagement from college admissions offices. A nationwide US field experiment found these applicants receive about 5 percentage points fewer responses compared to those without records, yet race appears irrelevant to this outcome.

Data & Methods:

• Prospective applicants sent emails requesting information;

• Experimental design randomly assigned fake criminal records or cleared backgrounds;

• Response rates tracked across public and private institutions.

Key Findings:

• Applicants with criminal records got significantly fewer responses (5 pp) from private schools;

• No differential response rates observed between Black applicants vs. White applicants;

• Bias remains even after accounting for selectivity, SES, and school funding;

• Advocate endorsements failed to reduce admissions bias.

Why It Matters:

This research reveals persistent discrimination against formerly incarcerated individuals in the higher education system—discrimination that doesn't appear based on race. The findings suggest private institutions are driving this bias despite no legal basis for such practices.

data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
British Journal of Political Science
Podcast host Ryan