FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
Why Mayors Still Stall Women's Rise Even Under Proportional Representation
Insights from the Field
descriptive representation
proportional representation
mayors
Norway
candidate data
Comparative Politics
APSR
11 Datasets
2 PDF
5 Text
6 Images
19 Other
1 Archives
Dataverse
Hidden Majoritarianism and Women's Career Progression in Proportional Representation Systems was authored by Daniel M. Smith, Alexandra Cirone, Dawn L. Teele, Gary W. Cox and Jon H. Fiva. It was published by Cambridge in APSR in 2025 est..

📚 A century of Norwegian candidate records

Proportional representation (PR) systems—especially closed-list PR—tend to have a higher share of women in politics than majoritarian systems, yet progress toward gender parity has been slow and uneven. This study examines whether single-occupant offices that function as career stepping stones create hidden majoritarian barriers to women's advancement.

🔎 What was traced and tested

  • Focus on single-occupant “majoritarian stepping stones,” such as local mayor and list leader positions.
  • Two research questions: 1) Do gender gaps emerge at these stepping-stone posts? 2) How does access to these posts affect women’s progression into higher offices?
  • A century of detailed candidate-level data from Norway is used to trace career trajectories and compare promotion patterns by gender.

📈 Key findings from the empirical analysis

  • Gender gaps do emerge at majoritarian stepping stones: women are underrepresented in single-occupant local posts that serve as common routes to higher office.
  • Parties have adopted compensating practices: when women occupy these stepping-stone positions they are often promoted to higher office at higher rates than men, reducing the negative effect of the initial gap.
  • These party-level workarounds mitigate—but do not fully erase—the adverse impact of hidden majoritarianism on women’s overall representation in higher offices.

💡 Why this matters

  • Even in PR systems that appear more gender-inclusive, single-seat offices can create bottlenecks that slow women's career progression.
  • The findings highlight the importance of looking beyond electoral systems to intra-party promotion practices and career pathways when assessing obstacles to gender parity.
data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
American Political Science Review
Podcast host Ryan