FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
Gender and LGBTQ+ Research Still Rare in Top Journals — And Mostly By Men
Insights from the Field
gender politics
LGBTQIA+
top journals
quantitative
editorial bias
Teaching and Learning
PS
1 Stata files
1 Datasets
2 Other
Dataverse
Still Marginalized? Gender and LGBTQIA+ Scholarship in Top Political Science Journals was authored by Jennifer Piscopo. It was published by Cambridge in PS in 2024.

📊 What Was Counted and How

This study measures publication trends for gender and LGBTQIA+ scholarship in five top political science journals from 2017 through 2023 (inclusive). The analysis identifies articles focused on gender politics and LGBTQIA+ politics and records author gender and methodological approach.

🔎 Key Findings

  • Gender and LGBTQIA+ research together make up only 5%–7% of articles published in the selected top journals over 2017–2023.
  • Most of that work focuses on gender politics; LGBTQIA+ politics account for a smaller share of the subgroup.
  • The majority of published gender and LGBTQIA+ research is quantitative in method.
  • Men author gender research at rates nearly three times their share in the American Political Science Association’s Women, Gender, and Politics research section, and men are also overrepresented among authors of LGBTQIA+ research.
  • Publication in top journals appears to be concentrated when manuscripts conform to disciplinary norms about methodology (favoring quantitative work) and author gender, suggesting editorial signals shape which manuscripts are routed to or accepted by these outlets.

🧭 Why It Matters

These patterns indicate that scholarship on gender and LGBTQIA+ topics remains marginal in leading political science journals and that methodological and authorial norms are linked to visibility. The skew toward quantitative methods and male authorship has implications for whose questions and approaches gain prominence, how editorial teams influence publication pathways, and which topics receive sustained attention within the discipline.

data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
PS: Political Science & Politics
Podcast host Ryan