FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
Direct Election of Senators Shifted Accountability Away from Congress
Insights from the Field
Direct election
Senate representation
Accountability shift
Foreign policy delegation
American Politics
PSR&M
2 Stata files
3 datasets
1 PDF files
1 text files
Dataverse
The Direct Election of Senators and the Emergence of the Modern Presidency was authored by Thomas Gray, Jeffery Jenkins and Phil Potter. It was published by Cambridge in PSR&M in 2022.

The 17th Amendment fundamentally changed senator accountability by introducing direct election. This shift exposed senators to a less attentive public on foreign policy, weakening congressional constraints on presidential power. We analyze this relationship using historical data showing how piecemeal adoption of the amendment influenced delegations of authority.

Direct Election & Accountability Change

Popular vote replaced state legislatures as senator selectors in 1913. This new accountability structure altered incentives: senators faced a less informed, disengaged public rather than knowledgeable state representatives.

Election Reforms & Presidential Power

Our findings demonstrate that direct election adoption progressively reduced congressional oversight of executive foreign policy initiatives. Data reveals clear trends toward executive dominance coinciding with this electoral reform.

Why This Matters

This research shows how everyday democratic processes can reshape institutional power balances. The unintended consequence of making senators more directly accountable to voters was creating space for a stronger presidency.

data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
Political Science Research & Methods
Podcast host Ryan