FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
Insights from the Field

Brexit Divide Ignites Economic Bias: Non-Partisan Split Shapes Perceptions


brexit divide
cognitive dissonance
uk survey
experimental data
European Politics
PSR&M
2 Stata files
1 datasets
Dataverse
A Tale of Two Peoples: Motivated Reasoning in the Aftermath of the Brexit Vote was authored by Miriam Sorace and Sara B. Hobolt. It was published by Cambridge in PSR&M in 2021.

The UK's Brexit referendum created a distinct non-partisan divide, influencing economic perceptions among Remainers and Leavers. This paper investigates how this salient political division triggered evaluative biases through self-and in-group justification mechanisms, aligning with the cognitive dissonance framework.

Data & Methods:

The study employs nationally-representative observational survey data alongside experimental surveys that prompt respondents about Brexit.

Key Findings:

Researchers demonstrate that economic perceptions became polarized along the Brexit divide. A significant effect emerges when people are reminded of their stance on Brexit:

* Remainers tend to view the economy more positively.

* Leavers consistently show a more negative outlook.

The Brexit reminder intensifies these pre-existing differences.

Why It Matters:

This research reveals that motivated reasoning, previously thought tied exclusively to partisan politics, can also be activated by other prominent political divisions. These findings suggest broader implications for understanding public opinion formation and economic perceptions in divided societies.

data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
Podcast host Ryan