FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
Insights from the Field

Greater Public Confidence in US Supreme Court Predicts More Congressional Jurisdiction Limiting


public opinion
judicial politics
institutional interaction
Supreme Court
Law Courts Justice
PSR&M
3 Stata files
9 datasets
1 text files
Dataverse
Greater Public Confidence in the United States Supreme Court Predicts More Jurisdiction Stripping was authored by Joseph Ura and Patrick Wohlfarth. It was published by Cambridge in PSR&M in 2022.

This study explores the relationship between American confidence in the U.S. Supreme Court and Congress's actions to strip its jurisdiction.

Background: Prior research connects public support for SCOTUS with both judicial independence and congressional efforts to curtail federal courts' power, suggesting these are linked primarily through workload concerns rather than ideological conflicts.

New Findings: Contrary to previous studies, our analysis reveals a positive correlation: higher public confidence in the Court actually predicts more jurisdiction-stripping legislation by Congress.

Implications: This counterintuitive result challenges existing assumptions about how court-public opinion dynamics influence legislative behavior and underscores the need for further investigation into these complex interactions.

data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
Podcast host Ryan