Our study explores opinion backlash to policies permitting immigrant demonstrations.

👉 Context: We examine how authorities managing immigrants' political rights affects public attitudes.

👉 Method: Through a large-scale survey experiment, we test reactions to liberal vs. restrictive policies.

Key findings reveal citizens polarize around these policies:

• Those who agree with permission become more sympathetic toward immigrants
• Those in favor of bans become more critical of immigration issues

This "policy backlash" concept offers new insights into the field by highlighting unintended consequences, contrasting with traditional assumptions of public opinion congruence or complete neglect. It demonstrates an inherent tension between majority preferences and minority rights.

🔍 Why This Matters: Our results suggest policies aimed at managing immigrant political integration may paradoxically deepen societal divides.