Introduction

State supreme court races, though critical to legal decisions nationwide, receive scant scholarly attention. This gap is addressed by examining campaign spending patterns across 281 races spanning 21 states between 1990 and 2000.

Data & Methods

Analysis draws from extensive election records covering diverse cases over two decades in multiple jurisdictions.

Key Findings

Spending varies significantly based on race characteristics, state-specific institutions, electoral contexts, and the overall supreme court environment. These variations reveal deeper influences than previously understood.

Implications for Other Elections

Understanding spending drivers here provides insights into broader campaign financing dynamics—suggesting that judicial races reflect similar underlying factors as other high-stakes elections.

Why It Matters

This research clarifies the financial landscape of state courts, offering tools to assess how resources shape outcomes in cases affecting millions.