📌 What Happened:

In October 2010 the Andhra Pradesh state government issued an emergency ordinance that halted microfinance activity in the state, creating a nationwide liquidity shock for lenders—especially those with loans concentrated in the affected districts. This policy-induced dislocation is used as a plausibly exogenous shock to identify the causal effects of reduced credit supply on consumption, earnings, and employment in rural labor markets in general equilibrium.

🧾 District Lender Records Matched to Household Surveys:

• Proprietary district-level data from 25 separate, for-profit microlenders.
• Matched to household-level data from the National Sample Survey.
• Exploits geographic variation in lenders' exposure to the Andhra Pradesh ban to isolate credit-supply changes.

🔎 Key Findings:

• District-level reductions in credit supply are associated with significant decreases in:
• casual daily wages,
• household wage earnings,
• and household consumption.
• Evidence points to a substantial consumption multiplier from credit, driven by two channels:
• reduced aggregate demand,
• and lower business investment.

🧮 A Simple Model to Explain the Magnitudes:

• A calibrated two-period, two-sector model of the rural economy incorporates both demand and investment channels.
• The model reproduces the order of magnitude of the observed wage declines, indicating the empirical results are consistent with general-equilibrium mechanisms linking credit, demand, investment, and labor markets.

📌 Why It Matters:

These results show that sharp contractions in microcredit can ripple through rural labor markets, lowering wages, earnings, and consumption via demand and investment channels. Findings inform debates on the broader macroeconomic and welfare effects of restricting microfinance activity and highlight the importance of accounting for general-equilibrium impacts when evaluating credit shocks.