FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
Immigration Sparks a Paradox in States' Welfare Spending
Insights from the Field
immigration
compensation theory
retrenchment
state welfare spending
Migration Citizenship
SPPQ
Dataverse
Compensation or Retrenchment? The Paradox of Immigration and Public Welfare Spending in the American States was authored by Ping Xu. It was published by Sage in SPPQ in 2017.

New research investigates how immigration influences public welfare spending across American states.

The study utilizes state-level data from 1999 to 2008, analyzing the connection between immigrant influx and government expenditure on social services. By integrating the race/ethnicity compensation theory with globalization perspectives, researchers developed nuanced hypotheses about this relationship.

Key Findings

* Immigration increases welfare spending in states with high unemployment and restrictive policies

* Conversely, immigration decreases welfare spending in states with strong job markets and inclusive policies

Real-World Relevance

This research demonstrates that the effect of migration on social support systems depends critically on economic conditions and policy environments.

The findings suggest political science theories must account for contextual factors when explaining government behavior. The results highlight immigration's complex impact, revealing both compensatory effects in economically distressed areas with restrictive policies AND retrenchment responses in prosperous regions with more inclusive approaches.

data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on Sage Journals
State Politics & Policy Quarterly
Podcast host Ryan
Dataverse may be empty.