FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
Multinomial Ideal-Point Models: Reclassifying Nonresponse Reveals Hidden Conservatism
Insights from the Field
ideal points
multinomial
EM algorithm
ANES
nonresponse
Methodology
Pol. An.
3 R files
1 archives
8 datasets
1 text files
Dataverse
A Multinomial Framework for Ideal Point Estimation was authored by Max Goplerud. It was published by Cambridge in Pol. An. in 2019.

🔎 What This Introduces

A multinomial framework for ideal point estimation (mIRT) is developed using recent advances in Bayesian statistics. The core is a flexible multinomial specification that nests most common ideal-point models as "special cases," providing a single, unified representation for a wide class of models.

đź§­ How The Framework Handles Extensions

  • The framework readily incorporates popular extensions, including dynamic smoothing, inclusion of covariates, and network models.
  • Estimation remains practical: models can be fit using either a Gibbs Sampler or an exact EM algorithm, preserving computational tractability even when extensions are added.

🛠️ Why a Shared Framework Matters

  • By showing that many existing models can be written and estimated within the same multinomial template, the approach aims to reduce the proliferation of bespoke ideal-point models.
  • The shared representation also broadens the ability of applied researchers to estimate models quickly using the EM algorithm.

📊 Applied Example — Scaling Survey Responses and Nonresponse (ANES)

  • The framework is applied to the practical problem of scaling survey responses, focusing on the American National Election Study (ANES).
  • A principled solution is proposed: treat survey questions as multinomial outcomes where nonresponse is modeled as a distinct category rather than ignored or imputed implicitly.

🔑 Key Findings (Exploratory)

  • Certain ANES questions attract substantially more invalid or nonresponse answers.
  • Many of these problematic questions—especially those that single out particular social groups for evaluation—appear to mask noncentrist (typically conservative) beliefs among respondents.
  • Results are presented as exploratory evidence that treating nonresponse as a modeled category can reveal substantive measurement issues.

🌍 Why It Matters

  • The mIRT framework offers a unified, flexible approach to ideal-point estimation that maintains computational feasibility while accommodating extensions.
  • Treating nonresponse as an explicit category in survey scaling has the potential to improve measurement and uncover hidden ideological patterns in public opinion data.
data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
Political Analysis
Podcast host Ryan