FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
A Simpler, Better Way to Model Network Data: AME Beats ERGM and LSM
Insights from the Field
Bayesian
dyadic data
network analysis
ERGM
latent space
Methodology
Pol. An.
1 other files
Dataverse
Inferential Approaches for Network Analysis. AMEN for Latent Factor Models was authored by Shahryar Minhas, Peter Hoff and Michael Ward. It was published by Cambridge in Pol. An. in 2019.

๐Ÿ” What This Paper Does

Introduces a Bayesian approach for inferential analysis of dyadic data that accounts for interdependencies through a set of additive and multiplicative effects (AME). The AME model is embedded in a generalized linear modeling framework, making it flexible for a variety of outcome types and substantive contexts.

๐Ÿงฉ How the AME Model Is Structured

  • Uses a Bayesian estimation approach for dyadic outcomes.
  • Models interdependence with additive and multiplicative latent effects (AME).
  • Operates within a generalized linear model framework, so covariate effects remain interpretable in familiar GLM terms.

๐Ÿงช How AME Was Compared to Other Network Models

Contrasts the AME approach with two prominent alternatives: the latent space model (LSM) and the exponential random graph model (ERGM). Relative to these approaches, AME is shown to be:

  • (a) Easy to implement
  • (b) Interpretable within a general linear model framework
  • (c) Computationally straightforward
  • (d) Not prone to degeneracy
  • (e) Able to capture first-, second-, and third-order network dependencies
  • (f) Notably superior to ERGMs and LSMs on a variety of metrics and in out-of-sample contexts

๐Ÿ“ˆ Key Findings

  • AME combines flexibility and interpretability by marrying latent-factor interdependence with the GLM structure.
  • Across multiple evaluation metrics and out-of-sample tests, AME outperforms both ERGM and LSM alternatives.

๐ŸŒ Why It Matters

AME offers a straightforward, principled route for nuanced inferential network analysis, suitable for a wide range of social science questions where dyadic interdependence must be modeled without sacrificing interpretability or computational tractability.

data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
Political Analysis
Podcast host Ryan