FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
When Time Matters, Use Cox: A Better Approach for Binary Panel Data
Insights from the Field
Cox
Logit
Duration
BTSCS
Transition probabilities
Methodology
Pol. An.
1 archives
Dataverse
Getting Time Right: Using Cox Models and Probabilities to Interpret Binary Panel Data was authored by Shawna Metzger and Benjamin Jones. It was published by Cambridge in Pol. An. in 2022.

📌 The Problem With Current Binary Panel Models

Logit and probit (L/P) models are the standard tools for binary time-series cross-sectional (BTSCS) data, and researchers typically add cubic splines or time polynomials to capture temporal dynamics. However, L/P models struggle with three other temporal features that commonly arise in BTSCS data:

  • whether covariate effects vary depending on time,
  • whether the underlying process is causally complex, and
  • whether the assumed functional form for time is correct.

Failing to account for any of these features produces misspecification bias and threatens the validity of inferences.

📊 How the Models Were Compared (Monte Carlo Evidence)

  • Monte Carlo simulations compare Cox duration models to standard logit models across a range of BTSCS settings.
  • Simulations include both a basic BTSCS scenario and more complex situations that introduce time-conditional effects and causal complexity.
  • Assessment focuses on the ability to test the same hypotheses, estimator performance, and susceptibility to misspecification bias.

🔍 Key Findings

  • Cox duration models create fewer opportunities for the kinds of misspecification bias that afflict L/P models with temporal complexity.
  • In basic BTSCS settings, Cox models perform about as well as logit models and sometimes better.
  • In more complex BTSCS situations, Cox models perform considerably better than logit models.

📈 A New Way to Read Cox Results

  • Transition probabilities are introduced as an interpretation technique for Cox models to make coefficients and effects more readily interpretable for practitioners.

🧭 Applied Example

  • An application to interstate conflict illustrates the practical differences in inference and interpretation between Cox and L/P approaches.

⚠️ Why It Matters

  • For BTSCS research, Cox duration models offer a viable alternative that reduces misspecification risk while allowing researchers to address the same substantive hypotheses as logit/probit models.
  • Using transition probabilities improves the accessibility of Cox-model results for applied audiences.
data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
Political Analysis
Podcast host Ryan