FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
Insights from the Field

Same-Party Candidates, Fewer Votes? Examining Undervoting after Top-Two Primaries Adoption


Top-Two Primary
Orphan Voters
Undervoting
California
Voting and Elections
SPPQ
Dataverse
No Republican, No Vote: Undervoting and Consequences of the Top-Two Primary System was authored by Colin A. Fisk. It was published by Sage in SPPQ in 2020.

The adoption of the Top-Two Primary system in California (2012) and Washington shifted primary access but potentially fractured general election voting.

🗳️Undervoting Effects: Voters without an affiliated candidate in either party—called Orphan Voters—were significantly more likely to undervote, especially when both major-party candidates remained in the race. Compared to voters with a copartisan candidate on the ballot, these Orphaned Voters showed nearly 20 percentage points higher rates of not voting.

🧠Voter Decision Models: A two-step framework explains this behavior:

  • Partisan Model: Voters unable to select their top choice party in the general election more likely abstain or undervote.
  • Ideological Model: All voters are influenced by ideological proximity, preferring candidates they perceive as closer ideologically regardless of partisan barriers. Those who vote tend to see less distance between themselves and the candidates than Orphaned Voters do.

🔍Real-World Impact: These findings illuminate how ballot construction influences voter turnout even among those with strong preferences.

data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on Sage Journals
Podcast host Ryan Dataverse may be empty.