FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
Why Republican Control Matters More Than You Think for Environmental Policy
Insights from the Field
partisanship
toxic releases
governorships
congress
American Politics
SPPQ
Dataverse
Are Republicans Bad for the Environment? was authored by Luke Fowler and Jaclyn Kettler. It was published by Sage in SPPQ in 2021.

Does partisanship influence environmental outcomes? Addressing this question requires more than just examining policy passage or spending.

Data & Methods Used: Toxic release dataset spanning 20 years, analyzing states and federal levels where Republicans held governorships or controlled Congress.

Key Findings: Republican officeholders do impact the environment—specifically when occupying governorships or controlling Congress. This challenges simplistic narratives about party positions.

Why It Matters for Political Science: Our analysis highlights how partisan control at specific offices (governor, House/Senate) shapes environmental policy differently than general partisanship does. The results offer nuanced insights into how the distribution of power across government levels affects our environment.

data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on Sage Journals
State Politics & Policy Quarterly
Podcast host Ryan
Dataverse may be empty.