This research investigates how legislators' ideological positions influence their support for distributive policies, particularly focusing on pork-barrel spending. Using survey data and legislative roll-call records from the United States Congress spanning multiple decades, we analyze patterns of representation across partisan divides.

Data & Methods: National surveys and congressional voting records analyzed via quantitative methods

Key Findings: Ideological alignment strongly predicts support for distributive policies; however, significant cross-cutting cleavages exist in specific policy domains. The results demonstrate that while party identification plays a role, individual ideological commitments shape legislative priorities.

Why It Matters: These findings highlight the complex relationship between ideology and representation in contemporary US politics. They suggest that simplistic models focusing only on partisan competition may overlook nuanced ideological dynamics affecting resource allocation.