Political science as a field increasingly demands transparency in data and methods so readers and reviewers can follow arguments and replicate findings. Yet citation practices have lagged: citations often refer to whole works rather than the specific pages or sections that support a claim.

📚 What Was Reviewed

• A content analysis of articles published in five top-tier political science journals in 2019.
• Measurement focused on whether citations provided detailed source information (for example, page numbers or other location markers) versus referring generally to entire books or articles.

🔎 Key Findings

• Only around 10% of citations in the sampled articles included detailed source information (e.g., page numbers or location information).
• The dominant disciplinary norm remains the use of general citations that point to whole works rather than specific parts.
• The analysis identifies several causes for this scarcity of detailed citations (as discussed in the article).

💡 What Is Recommended

• A call for more transparent citation norms across the discipline.
• Suggestions of preliminary steps toward achieving greater citation transparency.
• Proposed solutions to address challenges created by the growing prevalence of digital sources.

⚖️ Why It Matters

Transparent, precise citations are a crucial complement to open data and clear methods: they allow readers and reviewers to verify the specific textual or conceptual bases for claims. Improving citation practices strengthens accountability, interpretability, and the cumulative progress of research in political science.