📚 The Puzzle

Suicide attackers are often described as educated and economically well-off, a pattern commonly taken as evidence that especially capable individuals volunteer for suicide missions. This paper tests that self-selection explanation using unique personnel data from the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

📊 New Personnel Records Compare Volunteers and Fighters

The dataset contains personnel records with information that distinguishes individuals who volunteered for suicide attacks from those assigned to ordinary combat missions. The research design directly compares the characteristics of volunteers versus non-volunteers within ISIS.

Key features of the data and design:

• Novel personnel records covering ISIS members with indicators for volunteering for suicide attacks versus normal combat missions
• Direct within-organization comparison that isolates volunteer behavior from assignment decisions

🔎 Main Findings

• Evidence rejects the self-selection hypothesis: higher education and greater religious knowledge are negatively associated with volunteering for suicide attacks.
• Volunteers were less likely to be highly educated or to possess more religious knowledge, contrary to the interpretation that skilled individuals predominantly self-select into suicide missions.
• Results are consistent with an alternative mechanism: leaders actively screen recruits and select high-quality individuals to carry out suicide attacks, implying organizational demand drives who becomes a bomber rather than individual supply.

🧭 Why This Matters

These findings shift attention from individual motives to leadership choices in explaining who conducts suicide attacks. The study highlights the importance of leader-driven selection and screening in terrorist organizations, with implications for understanding recruitment dynamics and for policies aimed at disrupting attack pipelines.