This article examines persistent misconceptions linking refugees to terrorism through three prominent narratives: Trojan horse, copycat, and scapegoat. Using quantitative methods and data from multiple international sources, it systematically evaluates the validity of these claims.

Data & Methods

Drawing on large-scale survey data and counterterrorism statistics from over twenty countries across five continents, this research employs rigorous statistical techniques to analyze causal relationships between refugee populations and terrorism incidents.

Key Findings

• Contrary to popular belief, refugees are statistically far less likely than host country citizens to engage in terrorist activities

• Refugee resettlement policies have no discernible effect on local crime or radicalization rates

• Media framing significantly inflates the perceived threat connection between refugees and terrorism

Why It Matters

The findings challenge dominant public narratives that policymakers often uncritically repeat. This has profound implications for:

• Refugee policy debates in democratic societies
• Countering political Islamophobia through evidence-based discourse
• Understanding how misinformation shapes security policies