New Delhi's housing policy intervention involved distributing home-price subsidies randomly to residents in Mumbai through a lottery system.

Data & Methods:

* Methodology: A mixed-methods approach combining quantitative survey data from over 600 winning and non-winning households across multiple neighborhoods with qualitative insights from local focus groups.

* Research Design: Leverages the random allocation inherent in lotteries to establish causality between subsidies and political engagement changes

Key Findings:

• Winners reported increased confidence in interacting with municipal officials (15% rise).
• 70% of subsidy recipients initiated local service demands compared to less than half among non-recipients.
• Even renters exhibited greater knowledge about government services post-intervention.
• Changes included both more assertive claim-making and improved understanding of bureaucratic processes.

Why It Matters:

This research provides causal evidence on how targeted property subsidies influence local governance dynamics. Findings demonstrate that even indirect financial transfers can significantly alter citizens' political behaviors, offering crucial insights for designing pro-civic engagement housing policies.