FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
Insights from the Field

Counterintuitive Finding: Fuel Subsidies Hinder Democracy


Fuel Subsidies
Rentier State Theory
Democratization Process
Regression Analysis
Comparative Politics
ISQ
1 Stata files
3 Datasets
2 Text
3 Other
Dataverse
Fuel Subsidies Limit Democratization: Evidence from a Global Sample, 1990-2014 was authored by Matthew Fails. It was published by Oxford in ISQ in 2019.

This note addresses scholarly disagreement over why oil wealth impedes democracy.

It evaluates the foundational rentier state theory, proposing that domestic gasoline subsidies—measured in dollars per capita—significantly reduce democratization likelihood by acting as a substitute for societal demands to be heard.

New Measure Developed: A novel metric quantifying fuel subsidy generosity based on dollar-per-capita spending.

Global Dataset Used: Analyzes 1990–2014 data across nations.

Regression Analysis Findings: Fuel subsidies have a substantial impact comparable to economic growth rates in reducing democratization odds.

Methodological Contribution: Incorporating fuel subsidy measures helps explain the autocratic effect attributed to oil income.

Broader Significance: This analysis demonstrates how specific energy subsidy data can illuminate wider political economy questions.

data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on OUP
Podcast host Ryan