How do international institutions influence human rights compliance?

This article examines two key United Nations mechanisms: the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) and treaty bodies' state reporting. By analyzing their perceived effectiveness in driving implementation, we find contrasting strengths.

Pressure & Peer Review:

* The UPR excels at generating peer pressure through multilateral scrutiny.

* It leverages public attention as a powerful compliance catalyst.

Learning & Assessment:

* Treaty bodies provide crucial insights for state capacity building.

* They deliver practical recommendations tailored to specific national contexts.

* Offering accurate performance overviews helps states manage their obligations effectively.

The study reveals these mechanisms operate through different pathways. From a theoretical perspective, it demonstrates how the enforcement model provides particularly strong explanatory power compared to management or constructivist approaches for understanding compliance patterns. Data were gathered from forty semi-structured interviews and an online survey.