This article explores why governments sometimes adopt an intergovernmental approach—directly managing global issues through international cooperation—and other times step back, allowing nongovernmental actors to take the lead.

It argues that a key driver is domestic ideological leanings toward government activism. These ideologies influence both domestic and foreign policy by connecting national preferences for state action with international ones. The authors suggest they foster institutions conducive to intergovernmental collaboration.

Domestic Ideologies & International Approaches

The study posits that public support for limited or extensive government at home affects a nation's stance abroad. This creates tension between centralized governance and decentralized global solutions.

Using this framework, the article develops predictions about when governments are more likely to establish and join intergovernmental organizations.

Statistical Evidence on Global Governance Preferences

The hypothesis is tested using statistical analyses of historical developments in education policy—an area where international governance has been particularly prominent.

The analysis spans all issue-areas over the last century and a half, revealing patterns influenced by domestic ideological currents. Results confirm that governmental activism at home correlates strongly with intergovernmental approaches abroad.