This article argues that conservative viewpoints in political science face publication bias not due to explicit rejection but because their research often uncovers null findings, vulnerable to the file-drawer effect.

The Problem: The field's relative lack of representation among scholars may create an implicit bias against publishing nuanced or non-conforming results.

* Null Findings & Publication Bias: Studies supporting conservative perspectives tend to report fewer statistically significant effects.

* File-Drawer Problem Context: This phenomenon explains why null findings often remain unpublished, affecting the visibility of certain political science research.

* 2016 Election Example: Using data from the 2016 American National Election Studies (ANES), a clear pattern emerges showing how this dynamic operates in practice.

Why It Matters: Understanding this publication gap is crucial for assessing representativeness and bias within political science research. The article suggests that academia's publication practices may inadvertently skew our understanding of politically relevant topics.