This paper argues residential mobility hurdles significantly shape public views on immigration. Examining domestic housing policies and their constraints reveals a key driver of growing restrictionism, even outside traditional economic crises.

Data & Methods

* Analyzed national surveys from the US/EU region (2015-2023)

* Employed mixed-methods approach combining quantitative analysis with qualitative case studies

* Traced policy changes and their implementation across multiple countries

Key Findings

Overwhelming majority of surveyed populations face documented mobility barriers*

(over 85%)

Statistically significant correlation exists between higher perceived residential constraints and stronger public support for immigration restrictions*

Cross-national comparisons highlight shared housing market dynamics driving similar policy preferences despite geographic differences in implementation*

Policy Implications

The findings suggest policymakers cannot ignore domestic institutional arrangements when designing immigration policies. Addressing mobility issues may indirectly reduce the political pressure to restrict entry.