This study explores the interplay between traditional and Internet media within restricted information environments.

The Problem:

* Restricted information environments limit citizens' access to diverse political news sources.

* Traditional media often dominates these settings, while alternative sources may be suppressed or less accessible.

Our Approach:

We analyze how trust in different media channels affects political knowledge and opinion formation when access is limited. Using a comprehensive dataset of media consumption patterns across several countries with varying information restrictions, we employ advanced statistical modeling techniques to disentangle the effects of medium from content and control.

Key Findings:

* Trust significantly mediates the impact of media type on political attitudes:

• Citizens trusting traditional media even when restricted tend to align more with state-promoted narratives.
• Conversely, those distrusting traditional sources but able to access alternative online information show resilience against official messaging.

Why This Matters:

Understanding this dynamic offers crucial insights for scholars and policymakers analyzing political communication in authoritarian regimes or under censorship. It highlights the complex role of public trust versus source availability.