This article examines how donor and recipient characteristics influenced the timing of political action committee (PAC) contributions made to incumbent members during the 1993–94 election cycle.

Why Timing Matters

Contributions peaked around FEC deadlines, suggesting strategic behavior that affects perceptions of competitiveness and power dynamics.

Methodology & Findings

Using split-population event history models on PAC contribution data from this period reveals distinct patterns across different PAC types. While money volume varies significantly among donors, the timing is influenced by factors including recipient seniority or district type (larger districts vs. competitive seats).

Key Takeaways

This study demonstrates that even seemingly routine political contributions are embedded in strategic considerations for both incumbents and interest groups regarding their electoral timelines.