FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
Congressional Twitter Rhetoric Reveals True Partisanship Levels
Insights from the Field
Congressional Partisanship
Twitter Analysis
Ideology vs Partisanship
Legislative Behavior
American Politics
LSQ
1 Stata files
1 PDF files
8 other files
6 datasets
Dataverse
Measuring Congressional Partisanship and Its Consequences was authored by Jeremy Gelman and Steven Lloyd Wilson. It was published by Wiley in LSQ in 2022.

This study develops a method to measure congressional partisanship using social media data. Analyzing over 2.1 million tweets sent during two terms (2015-2018), we classify partisan language and quantify legislators' commitment to their party.

Methodology & Data: We employ computational linguistics on Twitter data, analyzing rhetoric toward Democrats and Republicans across two congressional cycles.

Our findings demonstrate a strong connection between online partisanship indicators and offline legislative behaviors. This measure—based solely on explicitly partisan language—predicts party unity voting even after controlling for ideology. It also explains bipartisanship expressions in Congress more clearly than traditional metrics.

Presidential Politics: We find presidential support ratings are primarily driven by a member's partisanship, not their ideological leanings.

This research provides two key contributions: (1) it operationalizes the difficult-to-measure concept of legislative partisanship using digital footprints; and (2) it shows this novel measure offers clearer insights into how partisan identity influences representation than established approaches.

data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on Wiley
Legislative Studies Quarterly
Podcast host Ryan