During President Trump's early presidency, intense media coverage about political scandals raised questions: do these stories impact partisan opinions or just highlight issues to partisans? This study uses a unique experimental approach—randomly exposing participants to varying levels of Trump-Russia scandal headlines over one week in June 2017—to address limitations in past research. Unlike previous studies that relied on self-reported media use and single exposures, this design provides multiple contacts with the same information.
Experimental Design:
• Used a repeated exposure setup spanning one week
• Randomly assigned participants to view more or fewer headlines
• Mimicked sustained news focus in an environment of high media choice
Key Findings:
• Republicans exposed to more scandal headlines rated Trump's performance lower and expressed stronger negative emotions toward him.
• Democrats and Independents showed no significant change in opinion based on exposure level.
• Perception of media bias remained consistent across participants regardless of headline exposure.
Implications:
These results suggest that even brief, repeated exposures to negative political coverage can influence partisan evaluations by shaping their perception of the information landscape.
| Collision with Collusion: Partisan Reaction to the Trump-Russia Scandal was authored by Joshua Darr. It was published by Cambridge in POP in 2019. |
