FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
Insights from the Field

Partisan Views on Spending: Beyond Social Welfare, Substantive Divergence Emerges


substantive divergence
public opinion
government spending
political cleavages
Political Behavior
POP
1 R files
1 text files
1 datasets
Dataverse
Substantive Divergence: The Meaning of Public Opinion on Government Spending in Red and Blue was authored by Kelly Rader and Katherine Krimmel. It was published by Cambridge in POP in 2021.

Conventional wisdom suggests public opinion on government spending boils down to views on social welfare programs. We challenge this using open-ended survey data.

Data & Methods: Original survey with open-ended responses analyzing partisan perspectives.

Key Findings:

* Public associations with spending span diverse government functions, not just welfare.

* Substantial divergence exists between Republicans and Democrats on specific government activities.

* Even opposing partisans (e.g., those wanting less spending) envision different government roles.

This reveals fiscal conflict extends beyond ideological lines into distinct partisan conceptualizations of government. The findings have implications for understanding party differences more broadly.

data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
Podcast host Ryan