This study examines divergent perceptions of officer-involved shootings following racial incidents. After the 2014 Michael Brown shooting in Ferguson, Missouri, researchers analyzed public reactions to understand how race influences interpretations of these events.

Key findings reveal two distinct processes driving perception differences:

• Whites showed stronger preference for information supporting justified officer actions

• Black Americans leaned toward narratives questioning police conduct

These disparities:

• Stem from race-based motivated reasoning (selective interpretation based on identity)
• Reflect differing prior beliefs about typical behaviors, with Ferguson data showing explicit divergence in these priors

The analysis demonstrates how racial divisions emerge even when controlling information. Summary judgments varied most significantly among strong racial group identifiers and those with divergent expectations about police conduct and Black civilians.