FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
Veterans in U.S. Elite Reduce Military Force Initiation, but Escalate Conflicts Once Started
Insights from the Field
civil-military relations
veterans elite
military escalation
Cold War
American Politics
APSR
1 text files
1 PDF files
1 datasets
1 other files
Dataverse
Speak Softly and Carry a Big Stick? Veterans in the Policy Making Elite and the American Use of Force was authored by Christopher Gelpi and Peter Feaver. It was published by Cambridge in APSR in 2002.

This paper analyzes how veterans in the American policy-making elite influence military decision making during Cold War and beyond.

Context & Data: Examines U.S. involvement in militarized interstate disputes from 1816 to 1992, analyzing data on veteran representation in executive branch and legislature.

Findings: Higher veteran percentages correlate with lower likelihood of initiating military conflicts but greater escalation once conflict begins. Veterans align more closely with officers than civilians regarding force usage.

Why It Matters: This research quantifies how civilian-military opinion gaps, particularly among veterans serving in government roles, shape U.S. foreign policy and military interventions.

data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
American Political Science Review
Podcast host Ryan