Scholars argue that effective deterrence requires a careful balance of military power and diplomatic behavior.

Research Methodology & Data:

* Analysis of fifty-eight historical cases through probit analysis.

* Focuses on conditions for extended vs. immediate deterrence success or failure.

Key Findings:

* Enhanced Deterrence: A defender's battlefield capability to prevent a swift victory strongly enhances deterrence credibility.

* Reciprocity Matters: Diplomatic and military reciprocity significantly contributes to successful deterrence outcomes.

* Past Behavior Predicts Future Outcomes: Defenders' previous records of yielding or being inflexible increase the likelihood of deterrence failure in crises.

Implications:

The study demonstrates that while military readiness builds trust, consistent policy behavior is crucial. A defender's past actions shape how allies (and adversaries) perceive their resolve.