The study challenges the idea that quantity alone matters in judicial decision-making.

➡️ Amicus Curiae Focus

It examines how interest groups, through amicus briefs, influence Supreme Court rulings.

➡️ Network Position Matters

Using network analysis from 1946-2001, researchers demonstrate that a group's perceived power is crucial when both sides have similar support levels.

➡️ Ideology Plays Key Role

Justices' own political leanings moderate the impact of liberal interest groups' influence.

The findings suggest that while amicus briefs are just one factor, their effectiveness hinges on context and judicial perspective.