FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
Less Bias in US Interest Groups? New Data Shows Surprising Preferences Until Weighted by Spending
Insights from the Field
interest group bias
PAC contributions
lobbying expenditures
congressional roll calls
American Politics
APSR
2 R files
20 datasets
Dataverse
Polarized Pluralism: Organizational Preferences and Biases in the American Pressure System was authored by Jesse Crosson, Alexander Furnas and Geoffrey Lorenz. It was published by Cambridge in APSR in 2020.

For years, critics have claimed the American interest group system is biased. But new direct measures of policy preferences using ideal point estimates (IGscores) for over 2,600 groups and 950 legislators on a common scale reveal less conservative bias than expected. The findings highlight stark differences between politicians and ideologically aligned groups but show clear biases when adjusted by PAC contributions or lobbying spending. This suggests political influence shapes policymakers' views of organized interests.

data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
American Political Science Review
Podcast host Ryan