FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
Insights from the Field

Government Agenda Power Boosted as Opponents Gain Scrutiny in 19th Century UK Parliament


opposition scrutiny
parliamentary responsiveness
government agenda power
Balfour's policy shift
European Politics
AJPS
1 datasets
1 text files
Dataverse
Ministerial Responsiveness in Westminster Systems: Institutional Choices and House of Commons Debate, 1832--1915 was authored by Andrew Eggers and Arthur Spirling. It was published by Wiley in AJPS in 2014.

This article examines ministerial responsiveness and opposition power in 19th century Britain. Using nearly half a million parliamentary speeches, it develops a novel measure of responsiveness showing ministers became more responsive during the period when government agenda-setting strength was maximized (roughly 1832-1915). The findings suggest that increased responsiveness coincided with and helped explain reductions in procedural power for opposition members. This highlights an important connection between institutional changes in government strength and parliamentary dynamics.

Data & Methods: New dataset of ~500k speeches from British House of Commons debates (1832-1915).

Key Findings: Ministers increased responsiveness around the same time they consolidated agenda-setting power. This responsiveness shift coincided with reductions in procedural powers for opposition MPs.

Why It Matters: Reveals how strengthening government authority can paradoxically lead to greater responsiveness while diminishing institutional leverage of the opposition.

data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on Wiley
Podcast host Ryan