FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
Stronger Legislatures Mean Riskier Bonds
Insights from the Field
Legislative Capacity
Institutional Strength
Credit Risk
States
American Politics
AJPS
1 R files
1 PDF files
2 text files
Dataverse
Legislative Capacity and Credit Risk was authored by David Fortunato and Ian R. Turner. It was published by Wiley in AJPS in 2018.

Does legislative strength reduce or increase credit risk? We explore this counterintuitive question by analyzing state general obligation bond ratings and measures of institutional capacity.

⚖️ Legislative Capacity: The ability to effectively draft, debate, and pass legislation varies significantly across states.

💰 Credit Risk Evaluations: Using nearly two decades of American state bond data, we find a strong negative correlation between legislative capacity and credit risk. States with more capable legislatures tend to have higher perceived credit risk in their bonds.

🔍 Data & Methods: Ratings come from major bond rating agencies covering almost all US states over an extended period. Institutional strength is gauged through multiple indicators including the efficiency of policy-making, legislative size, and political responsiveness.

💡 Key Findings: Higher capacity correlates with greater credit risk, even after accounting for other economic factors and state policies. This suggests that market actors perceive capable legislatures as introducing more policy uncertainty.

📍 Why It Matters: The findings challenge conventional wisdom about institutional strength and offer new insights into how democratic responsiveness impacts financial markets.

data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on Wiley
American Journal of Political Science
Podcast host Ryan