FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
Interest Group Signals in Congress: Early Cues vs Later Momentum
Insights from the Field
Cue-taking
Legislative Process
Interest Groups
Cosponsors
American Politics
AJPS
4 R files
1 PDF files
2 datasets
1 text files
Dataverse
Cue-Taking in Congress: Interest Group Signals from Dear Colleague Letters was authored by Janet Box-Steffensmeier, Dino Christenson and Alison Craig. It was published by Wiley in AJPS in 2019.

How do some bills advance while others stall? This paper explores how interest groups influence the legislative process through their endorsements in Dear Colleague letters.

These letters serve as key information sources for congressional members, especially early on. We find that strong endorsements from well-connected groups act as powerful cues to sway member opinions and attract initial cosponsors.

As legislation progresses, these influential groups have less direct impact. Instead, broader coalitions of organizations combined with growing numbers of cosponsors significantly boost a bill's chances of passage.

💡 Key Findings:

  • Well-connected groups' early endorsements act as strong cues for members.
  • Broader support (more co-sponsors and endorsing orgs) increases likelihood of success later on.

🔍 Real-World Relevance:

This research demonstrates how interest group political signaling shapes U.S. public policy via cue-taking mechanisms.

data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on Wiley
American Journal of Political Science
Podcast host Ryan