FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
Electoral Timing Matters? Field Experiment on U.S. Incentives Shows Nuances
Insights from the Field
Field Experiment
Investment Incentives
U.S. Municipalities
Electoral Cycles
American Politics
AJPS
1 Stata files
1 PDF files
1 datasets
1 text files
Dataverse
Electoral Institutions and Electoral Cycles in Investment Incentives: A Field Experiment on Over 3,000 U.S. Municipalities was authored by Nathan Jensen, Michael Findley and Daniel Nielson. It was published by Wiley in AJPS in 2020.

Did the timing of elections influence local economic development policies? We conducted a field experiment across over 3,000 U.S. municipalities to investigate this.

Method:

• Legally incorporated a consultancy firm and posed inquiries on behalf of a fictional investor seeking municipal incentives.

• Tested whether pre- or post-election periods affected the likelihood of local governments offering investment incentives.

Findings:

• Overall results showed no significant difference in incentive offers based on election timing. • However, analysis limited to manufacturing-focused municipalities suggests an effect does exist here.

• Additional observational insights indicate that executive elections and partisanship may correlate with these policies.

Why It Matters:

This research highlights the complex interplay between electoral politics and economic policy implementation at local levels.

data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on Wiley
American Journal of Political Science
Podcast host Ryan