Voter Decision-Making With Polarized Choices

Traditional wisdom suggests distinct party platforms empower citizens by giving them clearer control over government. But today, partisan polarization dominates US politics.

This study investigates how ideological conflict affects voter responsiveness to candidates' positions. The findings reveal that high polarization increases the role of motivated reasoning in political decisions, making voters less receptive to candidate policy proposals.

Our results combine insights from two observational studies and a survey experiment - all showing robust effects across various models. These findings highlight important implications for accountability mechanisms during an era defined by ideological divides.

Key Takeaways:

* Voters are less responsive to candidate ideology in polarized environments

* Motivated reasoning plays a larger role when parties are ideologically distinct

* This dynamic challenges traditional notions of voter control