FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
Insights from the Field

Why Women Shy Away From RRPs: The Role of Motivated Prejudice


radical right
women voters
prejudice control
policy preferences
European Politics
BJPS
3 Stata files
1 text files
Dataverse
Why Women Avoid the Radical Right: Internalized Norms and Party Reputations was authored by Eelco Harteveld and Elisabeth Ivarsflaten. It was published by Cambridge in BJPS in 2018.

Gender disparities persist in radical right party (RRP) voting despite similar policy preferences on key issues like immigration. This article reveals an unexpected finding: women are more motivated than men to control prejudice, particularly toward groups RRP policies might target.

Methodology & Data

The analysis uses survey data from across Europe and employs causal inference techniques.

Key Mechanism

* The gender gap in voting is linked to internal motivations against prejudice among women.

* RRPs face challenges when their platform conflicts with these normative pressures for women voters.

The Puzzle This Study Solves

The research shows that even where policy preferences align, the psychological motivation differs:

```

  • Women are often more internally motivated to control prejudice against minorities.
  • These motivations create political costs for parties perceived as prejudiced or discriminatory.

```

Implications & Original Contribution

This study demonstrates how some RRPs can navigate these normative conflicts and maintain distinct voting patterns.

data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
Podcast host Ryan