FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
Why Do Men Vote for Extreme Parties? Gendered Heuristics in Electoral Behavior
Insights from the Field
gender gap
heuristic theory
social cues
comparative study electoral systems
Voting and Elections
BJPS
1 Stata files
Dataverse
Gender Differences in Vote Choice: Social Cues and Social Harmony as Heuristics was authored by Eelco Harteveld, Stefan Dahlberg, Andrej Kokkonen and Wouter Van Der Brug. It was published by Cambridge in BJPS in 2019.

Gender disparities in voting patterns persist across democracies. This research explores the role of gender-specific heuristics—men's lower sensitivity to social cues versus women's greater concern with social harmony—in shaping party choices. The study finds that men are disproportionately drawn to stigmatized and ideologically extreme parties, while women favor mainstream options perceived as socially harmonious.

Drawing from comparative electoral data across 28 countries (CS/ES waves), the analysis demonstrates how these psychological factors create systematic voting differences. Key findings reveal significant gender gaps in party support that correlate strongly with social perception traits rather than ideology alone.

This research reframes our understanding of democratic voting, emphasizing its inherently social dimension.

data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
British Journal of Political Science
Podcast host Ryan