|
|
|
| Switch to 103th House of Representatives |
| Vote# | Description (Highlights are coding aids) asc / dsc | Bill/Res | Pres "Vote" | Pres Notes | More info | |
| s103v40 | (SENATE REJECTED NICKLES AMENDMENT NO. 182, TO ELIMINATE THE ENERGY TAX AND OFFSET LOST REVENUES BY REDUCING SPENDING INCREASES.) | SConRes18 | 6 | Nay vote voteview/CQ=NAY supports pres position | Voteview 6 | |
| s103v42 | (SENATE TABLED THE GRASSLEY MODIFIED AMENDMENT NO. 184, TO FREEZE NON-DEFENSE DISCRETIONARY SPENDING ACROSS THE BOARD FOR FIVE YEARS.) | SConRes18 | 1 | Yea vote voteview/CQ=YEA supports pres position | Voteview 1 | |
| s103v48 | (SENATE TABLED THE WALLOP AMENDMENT NO. 194, TO ALTER THE INSTRUCTIONS TO THE COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES BY REDUCING THE AMOUNTS ASSUMED TO BE GENERATED THROUGH INCREASES IN GRAZING FEES, CHANGES TO THE MINING LAWS OF THE UNITED | SConRes18 | 1 | Yea vote voteview/CQ=YEA supports pres position | Voteview 1 | |
| s103v50 | (SENATE TABLED THE DOMENICI AMENDMENT NO. 198, TO ADJUST DEFENSE SPENDING CONSISTENT WITH A $60 BILLION REDUCTION FROM LAST YEAR'S DEFENSE PLAN OVER 1994 TO 1998.) | SConRes18 | 1 | Yea vote voteview/CQ=YEA supports pres position | Voteview 1 | |
| s103v57 | (SENATE TABLED THE LOTT AMENDMENT NO. 240, TO STRIKE THE PROPOSED TAX INCREASE ON SOCIAL SECURITY INCOME, AND TO PROVIDE THAT THE REVENUE REDUCTION IS OFFSET BY A REDUCTION IN PROPOSED NEW SPENDING.) | SConRes18 | 1 | Yea vote voteview/CQ=YEA supports pres position | Voteview 1 | |
| s103v59 | (SENATE TABLED THE GRAMM AMENDMENT NO. 249, TO STRIKE THE INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX INCREASE, THE ENERGY TAX INCREASE, AND THE SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS TAX INCREASE, AND AN EQUIVALENT AMOUNT OF NEW SPENDING.) | SConRes18 | 1 | Yea vote voteview/CQ=YEA supports pres position | Voteview 1 | |
| s103v60 | (SENATE REJECTED THE DOLE AMENDMENT NO. 258, IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE.) | SConRes18 | 6 | Nay vote voteview/CQ=NAY supports pres position | Voteview 6 | |
| s103v65 | (SENATE TABLED THE NUNN AMENDMENT NO. 263, TO EXPRESS THE SENSE OF THE SENATE THAT THE CONGRESS SHOULD ENACT A CAP ON THE GROWTH OF NON-SOCIAL SECURITY MANDATORY SPENDING PROGRAMS.) | SConRes18 | 1 | Yea vote voteview/CQ=YEA supports pres position | Voteview 1 |